Agree. But I don't see either an ethical or legal issue. He owes the money.
Originally Posted by mia
I do not see any legal issue, only an ethical one. Recipriocity is irrelevant. Conjectures about how the other party might behave if the roles were reversed don't relieve you of your obligation to pay.
If the original poster had said that MBNA wanted to charge retroactive interest, or report the amount past due, there would be something to discuss.
dennis