Originally Posted by kokonutz
Ok, ok: Although this decision has already been made, I 'd be interested in hearing why each of the TB members voted the way they did. You know, you wouldn't have to do this every single time if the TB forum was open read only blah blah blah.
I am especially curious about the abstentions and non-voters.
Thanks!
Kokonutz,
Glad to respond as always.... sorry for the delay... but house hunting.
First and foremost, I voted against this because of #4. It has been made clear that the Talkboard is to take no decisions as it relates to moderation.. and this motion does.
At a more basic level, #4 makes no sense. For those that believe all those black helicopters theories... it would be simple for a moderator running for election to have a fellow moderator suspend another candidate.
In addition, #4 would - in essence - place candidates above the TOS in that only Randy could suspend them... meaning that he would have to review posts by all the candidates and take all decisions on suspensions during the election. None of us should be above following the same rules as everyone else just because we are running for Talkboard.
Finally, I fully supported Sandiego1K's suggestion for a minimum time of membership before being allowed to vote... and even stand for election.
William