<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by paullevi:
skofarrell:
The TransAt flight would not be considered by Boeing at all, it was an A330.
I'll just say without citation thay my definition is the prevailing one used in both the legal and aviation worlds.</font>
Actually it would, take a look at the Boeing paper I've linked above, it covers all commercial aircraft.
With regards to "Hull Loss", doesn't Boeing's statement: "These definitions are consistent with those of the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) and International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO)." count for anything?
Doesn't "Loss" connotate something a lot more severe than simple damage?
[This message has been edited by skofarrell (edited 11-16-2001).]