FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Would the Gov't really tell us if the crash WAS an attack?
Old Nov 13, 2001 | 6:48 pm
  #14  
squeakr
Moderator: Hilton Honors, Practical Travel Safety Issues, Information Desk & San Francisco
10 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: San Francisco CA
Programs: UA, Hilton, Priceline, AirBnB
Posts: 11,319
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by mdtony:
You are kidding, right?

Reagan couldn't keep a simple arms for hostages deal quiet. Clinton couldn't keep a simple tryst with an intern quiet.

And yet you think the government could keep evidence that an airliner crashed due to a terrorist attack quiet?
</font>
I don't know. This government is VERY good at keeping issues secret that they want to .

And look I'm not even proposing that it would be from entirely evil intent. If it was seen as for the good of the airlines and for the flying public, to think this was a freak accident when it wasn;t - there are some quarters who might support such a coverup.

squeakr is offline