FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Current procedures do not detect liquids in carry-on
Old Aug 16, 2006 | 8:08 pm
  #32  
Djlawman
Original Member
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: NJ
Posts: 3,343
Originally Posted by wierdo
Thanks to Djlawman for spurring me to Google "liquid explosives" and learn about these things for myself.
Well, thanks, but reading all that stuff made me more concerned than I was before. I agree with you that the binary explosives seem difficult to create on-board.

I would therefore be more concerned about nitroglycerin. Relatively easy to synthesize, from readily available ingredients. Can be distilled beforehand, not produced onboard. Very unstable (so it might cause problems going through security, etc.), UNLESS cooled sufficiently (like kept in an ice cooler with some dry ice). And very powerful explosive qualities.

Its detonation qualities, from what I read, would seem to require a blasting cap or some other form of ignition, rather than just an electric charge into a container of liquid. But, it will probably be harder to find the cap or detonation device in a screening search, than it would to locate the liquid.

Nitroglycerin also avoids the scrutiny that taking the mixing utensils, ice, etc. to the lavatory will cause, as well as the extended time necessary to create the binary explosive. I don't know what the stuff smells like, but I doubt it would need to be exposed very long, so the smell is unlikely to be a giveaway.

So, that's the one that worries me the most. They tried it on PAL flight, with the nitro disguised in a contact lens solution bottle.
Djlawman is offline