Is 10% Fare for Infants fair or another example of rip off Britain?
I have always found the 10% fare for non-seat occupying infants a rip-off. Why should an infant be charged more if their parent chooses to fly J of F rather than Y? The infant receives no extra benefit from travelling in a higher class - effectively it is merely a surcharge to deter choice of those cabins (albeit one which many of you might support for that very reason

). What do you think?