FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Truth in advertising: Why is a business class seat on 2 class plane called 1st class?
Old Jul 26, 2006 | 11:37 am
  #12  
jmd001
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: San Diego Area
Programs: UA Gold MM, AA Gold MM, FB Gold, Marriott Plat LT, HH Gold, IHG Plat, WoH Discvst, Hertz PC
Posts: 1,871
Originally Posted by stevenshev
Two points: 1) Logic --- First implies the First (Best) Cabin on the plane. Therefore first is a logical title. 2) Practicality --- Business was an afterthought to First and has been marketed as an in-between. I always think it's superbly weird when there is Business on a plane, but no first. If business is an in-between class, what is it between in such a case? Y and the flight deck? The only downside is annoying airlines who refuse to issue C awards in UA 2 class F, as they try to tell you that only F is available. NO, F IS C. ARGH.
I respectfully disagree.

I believe the name of a class should be reflective of the level of service and comfort received and be more or less consistent across all equipment flown by a particular airline, not whether is the best on that particular piece of equipment. To me, the service/comfort of the front end of a 319 is vastly inferior to that on a 744 (suite). Hence, the name of the class should be different.

Further, while I have never actually paid full-boat to sit in C on a 3-class plane, I would consider doing so. I would NEVER pay to sit in F on any 2-class aircraft in UA's inventory!
jmd001 is offline