It seems that one of the problems with the TB procedures is that once a motion is made voting begins immediately. This doesn't allow much time for input from members (particularly if the fact of the motion's being up for a vote isn't ever communicated to the membership). Another problem we have seen from time to time over the years is this or that TB member who seems to be unwilling to answer questions.

I wonder if an addition of a "direct referendum" or "initiative" option to the TalkBoard "constituion" might help in those cases where members feel shut out or unheard?

E.g., such a provision might take one of two forms: a) upon petition supported by xx number of FT members, the TB will be directed to vote on the motion that the petitioner is bringing, or b) upon petition supported by yy number of members, an "initiative" shall be put before the entire TB membership.

In the latter case, you'd obviously want a pretty high threshhold. But either of these tools might increase trust and transparency. It's clear that there is some unsettling and shared discontent with the TB's current procedures, and it's also clear that the TB members are people of good will who no doubt would not want the perception afoot that they are not responsive.