parnel you just called me a liar several times without basis, something I do not appreciate.
In an earlier post you wrote this:
Originally Posted by parnel
I have challenged Simpson in a personal email to him to show that his beefs are legit and not part of his being told he wasn't royalty by AC personnel. He responded in a very indirect manner which tells me his beef is personal and not really related to his complaints. IOW's he's a whiner with a bully pulpit.
And in the post above, you wrote this:
Originally Posted by parnel
I have emailed him and suggested that he challenge what I heard which would have made his column more believable......with no repsonse.
In one post you said he responded to you in an indirect manner, and in another you say he did not repond to you at all. Which is it? And who is lying here?