Let me understand something correctly...two flyers qualify for 2003 based on 2002 flying -- one as a PM and the other as a GM. In 2003, both fly 95,000 "paid miles" and both have so many NAMUs and 800mile upgrades earned in 2002 (earned by the platinum before he/she became platinum) that neither needs to hit MSUs earned in 2003 to upgrade. Under this scenario, the GM would have 32 500 MSUs for use in 2004 while the PM would only get 20 500 MSUs? Is this right??? How is this possibly fair? If that is the way it works, why should a PM want to fly Delta when GMs get better perks. Please tell me I have this wrong and how the scenario would really work.