<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by IM4Travel:
Why are you bringing this to FT?? This has nothing to do with FT...and you know what I'm getting at...should be addressed elsewhere...agree or disagree with the e-mail...it's a totally DIFFERENT forum and I think the moderators should lock this one up.</font>
I'm not quoting to disagree but to say I too think another thread may have been better but, then again, I'm glad its here or I may never had read it.
I know just the tiniest bit about disclosure law, enough to be dangerous. Anyway, I believe it works that Hilton didn't have to give squat if they didn't want to. I was an obvious mistake to any average-thinking person.
With his not readily accepting Hilton's generous offer, I'm afraid the 300-night guy has only served to announce to the world his greed and low character. (Actually, if Hilton wanted to look innocent and willing, against the bad, someone-no-one-wants-to-be tourist, then this was great marketing!)
Uh, that was half off the most inexpensive rate, not rack rate?