FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Why Conrad is not considered as a Luxury hotel?
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 6:34 am
  #13  
Chapel Hill Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Chapel Hill, NC - UA Nobody (sigh)/0.925MM, HHonors Diamond
Posts: 3,510
Originally Posted by derpelikan
the conrad hongkong was really old and dated. the renovated suites arent good.

compared to the conrad tokyo or bangkong the hongkong conrad should be a HILTON and not be allowed to be a Conrad.
Well, right now there is someone thrashing the Conrad BKK for being a dump, so I guess there's no accounting for taste.

I've been to the Conrads in BKK, SIN, and HKG and enjoyed them all, but then I don't have the highly-refined sensitivities of a luxury-hotel denizen as I'm just a working stiff. All of my Asia travels are for pleasure and the Conrads are a treat. Maybe someday I'll hit the lottery and try some "real" luxury properites.
Chapel Hill Guy is offline