FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Gilmore decision
View Single Post
Old Jan 31, 2006 | 11:22 am
  #139  
bdschobel
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Winter Garden, FL
Programs: Delta DM-3MM United Gold-MM Marriott Lifetime Titanium Hertz President's Circle
Posts: 13,498
Originally Posted by Doppy
...Then there is the Soviet Union which produced 120-some portable nuclear bombs (these are the "suitcase" type). It's been able to account for 40-some of them....
I don't want to sound too complacent about this, but nuclear bombs need to be "recharged" frequently to remain potent. They can't just sit around for years and years like conventional explosives can. In fact, when the U.S. had missiles based in Europe, the warheads had to be flown back and forth to Amarillo (the Pantex plant) periodically for this reason. The recharging process is tricky and requires access to hard-to-get, controlled materials (like beryllium, as just one example). People in the know are pretty sure that the missing Soviet bombs are no longer fissionable, but their fissile material could be used in a "dirty" bomb, of course.

Bruce
bdschobel is offline