FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - split thread: profiling
View Single Post
Old Nov 12, 2005 | 11:46 am
  #35  
Jotmo
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Beloit, WI
Programs: UA M+, Hertz, Avis, Holiday Inn, Marriott
Posts: 53
Originally Posted by Doppy
No, that's not what those who have argued against profiling assumed. Please reread the arguments.


If you look at terrorrist attacks in the US alone, it's pretty evenly balanced between Muslims and non-Muslims over the long run. Now, if you're talking about groups like Al Qaeda in general, then yes, there are more Muslims out there to get us. But a couple problems arise:

(1) How is the TSA supposed to know what religion someone subscribes to? There are white Muslims, Asian Muslims, African Muslims, Arab Muslims and so on.

(2) How is the TSA supposed to know how old someone is?

(3) We know that groups like Al Qaeda are smart enough to use people who don't fit the male, 17-40 description. They use women (witness the husband-wife duo in Jordan a few days ago). They'll use people who aren't in that age range.

(4) What is the TSA supposed to do if a 25 year old Muslim male presents himself at the checkpoint? (Remember that the 9/11 hijackers didn't have any prohibited items on them, and many did get an extra careful screening by the checkpoint staff.)


Actually the concern is that some want to narrowly define the enemy to the point where we're getting less security for our effort instead of more.
Your entire argument in this post can be summed up as follows. "There are problems and difficulties with how to actually develop a criteria for profiling. Therefor we shouldn't try."

Nice. Let's just give up then.
Jotmo is offline