FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Anyone familiar with pixel density criteria for digital enlargemets?
Old Aug 28, 2005 | 10:20 am
  #15  
CPRich
FlyerTalk Evangelist
40 Countries Visited
5M
100 Nights
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pittsburgh
Programs: MR LT Titanium, AA LT PLT, UA SLV, Avis PreferredPlus, HH Gold, Hertz PC, National Executive, etc.
Posts: 31,643
Originally Posted by Sam - DFW
What is the default size file for pictures taken with higher resolution?

Can people that are using larger MP cameras "maxed out" please provide insight?
On my recent trip to HI, I shot RAW+embedded Large/Fine JPEG and the files from my 6.3MP camera ranged from 8-14MB, averaging around 10. But unless you want to deal with a digital darkroom, RAW converters, custom white balance, gray cards/WhiBal, color spaces, etc., I wouldn't recommend it.

Just shooting high resolution JPEG averages about 2.8MB, with a range from 1.5 to about 3.8. This number should be directly proportional to the MP within the camera sensor, assuming each camera vendor implements the JPEG compression alogorithms in a similar manner.

Shooting lower resolution can save you space but, as the article said, CF cards cost me about $110 for 2GB just before I left, disk is about $0.25/GB, and CD's can be found free after rebate, so saving storage isn't much of a deal. And finding that you undersized that one magic shot that you want to enlarge would be a bummer.

Dpreview.com for FT-equivalent in photography. There are lots of other good sites, but that's where I tell folks to start.
CPRich is offline