Originally Posted by Mats
My patient was alert and oriented--but he did lose consciousness during the incident. Right now he's doing very well, he is articulate and a good historian.
But as far as the weapon goes--my job was to examine him, not "cross examine him" (ha ha).
Anyway, YES--you're right. The irony was about having someone hired to protect safety end up causing life-threatening wounds. This was allegedly with a weapon that was originally designed to find weapons. So that part is perfectly accurate.
That wasn't a "set up" to make anyone angry or defensive--it was just a commentary on a sad situation.
And my comment wasn't directed against you. You merely shared what you observed and what you were told. Others, however, quickly jumped on a bandwagon whether you intended to have one there or not and immediately took this in a direction that you may not intended for it to travel. That's my point.
If I waited, I'm sure someone would have tried to make a wrongful death post as the basis for disbanding TSA even though you made it clear that TSA wasn't involved.
