Apparently the above post is indicative of an example of how some have no trouble rolling over facts to advocate revisionist history.
Let me help you with some basic facts and interrupt your use of confusion to advocate your version of "history" -- a "history" story which is nothing more than revisionist history to peddle political viewpoints regardless of facts & reality.
Presuming that by "Saddam" you are talking about Saddam Hussein and that by "WTC II att[a]cks" you are referring to 9-11, here are some facts:
1. OBL was behind the WTC II (aka 9-11) attacks
2. OBL & Co. made repeated attempts on Saddam Hussein's life and on attacking his regime.
3. No objective evidence of Iraqis involved in Saddam Hussein's government participating in the attacks on 9-11 or in the planning. KSM and OSS have independently confirmed such and OBL-, KSM- and OSS-handlers in the ISI know that to be the case too.
What an entertaining way to mix facts and fiction. Due to A (a false A at that) and unmentionables that cover everything from A to Z, he was removed. Get to the chase. The "and a few other issues" were why he was removed. Your Item 1 was the false god used to rally a critical mass to buy fiction so that a new reality could be designed. Of course, reality is not easy to design, but fictions are.
The Ottoman Empire was not looked upon kindly by either Al-Qaeda or by the Taliban. Their inspiration comes from Arab (and even Kurdish-led) adventures far more than Turkish (read: Ottoman) ones.
If you don't want to let the facts get in your way, that's your own business; however, dishonesty and revisionist history do not a reality make.
The (il)logic of false choices.
Very easy to understand that you are operating on false premises. See my above response to your Item 1. (And the Prague "meeting" is just pushing the envelope to the point of prima facie insanity.)
I hope the following is not too hard to understand:
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor..._iraq_cia_dc_4
Apparently I am not the only that knows that Iraq was not a choice property for attacking in the manner it was.
D-, when swimming past your above fiction, I am not the only one who failed to encounter any meaningful hint of reality in reading your post. "Your knowledge" and "ability to determine the truth" clearly produces different results than the reality as observed by far more objective realists.