Originally Posted by DMorris
I have visited Brunei 9 times in the past 15 years. I also know one of the Brits who hade extended dealings with this country in the 70s and 80s. Just to be on the safe side, I did a fact check on my numbers about the country before posting and they are spot on.
Flawed logic. Example: I have visited Walter Reed 9 times in the past 15 months. I also know one of the Americans who had extended dealings with the medical center in the 70s and 80s. Just to be on the safe side, I did a fact check on my numbers about the medical center before posting and they are spot on. Invalid, implied conclusion: I am an expert on Walter Reed.
Originally Posted by DMorris
Some more facts for your viewing pleasure:
1) My claims are valid, regardless of your comments.
Irrelevant. The implication of your claims are not.
Originally Posted by DMorris
2) KentownFlorida started the thread on a Muslim Nation.
3) You were very willing to respond and join in a discussion about a Muslim Nation. It took you all of 14 minutes to respond to a Muslim thread. What does that tell us about your motives?
Regarding Item 3, the mind-reading has failed. You have no idea about the extent of my willingness to discuss that item. Posting a simple response is not an indicatioin of a willingness to discuss that item. I just respond to questions where I know the answer already and I don't need to be spoon-fed.
Originally Posted by DMorris
4) I am discussing the topic of the thread. See post #1 and post #2.
Only in the most creative and convoluted sense possible.
Originally Posted by DMorris
Now for my last two sentences in my original post in this thread: "Aaahhh.... the benefits of colonialism. Now, if we could just implement the practice again............" The first sentence refers to the positive results gained of implementing English Common Law and maintaining freedom of religion. Two ideas that reasonable people would consider a desirable goal and practice. The last sentence is a thinly disguised reference to President Bush's current Foreign Policy.
More revisionism. You really want to post in OMNI, right?
Originally Posted by DMorris
Yes it is. Your pre-packaged comments and race baiting practices used over and over again in various threads is too routine. How about a discussion of the topic and facts next time GU?
A bit off topic but relevant - How do you, GU, maintain your immunity status from "prosecution" and recieve "granted" permission to invoke racist labels and engage in race baiting?
For example:
http://flyertalk.com/forum/showthread.php?t=442956
Yes, this is getting to be too routine, both GU's rants and his "get out of jail free card" for every violation. Maybe that is one of the rewards of Evangelist status - no guidelines for racist rants.
Bringing in material from other threads in such an explicit manner is clear indication of a desire to go off-topic. Try again.
To refresh your memory, you have still failed to answer a simple question asked of you earlier in this thread:
Do you still advocate beating "the natives" into submission?