Originally Posted by Plant Life
Please clarify the point that you are attempting to make here as the premise is invalid, the evidence is irrelevant and the validation is non-existent.
Your above claim is your claim, but it's invalid. Your request for me to clarify the point is amusing, especially given what you included in the above statement. Just think about it.
Originally Posted by GUWonder
Prediction:
As I said before, those of the "security at any cost" types who go on the offensive will bring up, amongst other things, all sorts of excuses for why this was not the wrong action. And I guess re-directing the discussion away from the outcome and into a meta-discussion is just another form of that offensive.
Evidence:
Originally Posted by Plant Life
Just curious, is FlyerTalk typically littered with so many inappropriately used words, made-up words, incoherent grammar, lack of logical though and failure to comprehend basic reasoning?
While lurking over the past week, I hadn't noticed any of that. But in reading this thread, it seems to be commonplace. Perhaps it is unique to this forum (or even this thread) as I hadn't read much here before posting on this thread. I probably would have missed this thread altogether had it not been listed on the FlyerTalk homepage and caught my attention.
Prediction validated.
It's really pretty simple.