Originally Posted by DMorris
Statement for review:
My conclusion by applying the 'Principles of Sufficient Reason' formula and identifying your pseudo-ratiocinations by omission:
I stand behind my conclusions.
Nothing complicated here. Just basic Logic 101.
Nothing complicated, but what you posted is simply wrong and fails on various grounds.
The results are that your "logical" "links" produce unsound/invalid conclusions; and your "basic Logic 101" does so repeatedly. I recommend further education on these matters if you really have an interest in minimizing your demonstrations of flawed logic.
"Sometimes you are your worst enemy." You wouldn't want that to be the case, right?
Standing by wrong conclusions doesn't make them right.
