Originally Posted by GUWonder
"Yes" to the first question; and they've always been present, for that's the nature of good data-based research and conclusions and their applicability.
Prove it. The one or two word qualifier wouldn't be to hard to type.
Originally Posted by GUWONDER
Nearly all of your above claims have been refuted in prior posts. I refer you those.
Never has this happened. You have never refuted anything other than saying "read my posts". I did and you make very vague, contridicting and general statements, which I have proven. This is the difference between us, I have evidence and you do not.
Originally Posted by GUWonder
... and your mischaracterizations (and then some) and misunderstandings apparently will remain. C'est la vie.
.
I understand completely, you have an opinion that you would like to support with fact, but are unable to do so.
Originally Posted by GUWONDER
.. and my statements still stand, with no change -- except in perhaps the understanding of those who are confused when there is a failure to be more careful in reading the words of others.
I have shown on numerous times your vague, general and contradicting statements, which is truly sad. I would respect your opinion, I may not have agreed with it but I would respect it as yours. To say you have a study that obviously doesn't exist to try to support your statement is very disheartening. Many people make statements like this, they say they have evidence, but when it comes down to what is real and what is not, they can't produce it. LEO's deal with this behavior frequently. It is okay we understand why you would do this.
You have made a statement that is insulting, and when questioned you state that data supports it, but are unable to produce it. What a long road to get to your "ill-informed" opinion.
