Originally Posted by Braddelauter
Originally Posted by GUWonder
Question all you want, but you are clearly not always right given the above. After all, the FOIA is not always applicable, nor are appropriate, proper requests always made under FOIA (as applicable).
If you correctly read what I posted previously, it might be helpful.
I have tried to reread your post and am quite confused at your point. I just don't believe the "data" exists and without a reference I'll stay there.
Ok; I have gotten the same response before. [When I first mentioned (on FT) that images of Iraqis being abused by my compatriots were coming out shortly and that US government pressure to shut down the release had failed, then I heard it all -- including the "prove it, show me" demands. Shortly thereafter, those images came to be known as the Abu Gharib photos. (And when I said there were videotapes too, including of boys being sodomized, I got the same response too.) You should visit OMNI, it's an interesting place on occassion.]
Here's a hint: Think about FOIA applicability and limitations and get back to us (and read some of the other posts further up very closely).
Originally Posted by Braddelauter
Originally Posted by GUWonder
To what are you referring? What "limited number of incidents" are you claiming that I described? [I didn't refer to the "northeast" or even a TV report.
I'll paraphrase you on this one, read my post.
Funny, but the point's been missed yet again.
Here's a hint: those "limited number of incidents" and "northeast" TV report you mentioned, I did not bring up. Someone else -- or at least you
-- may have mentioned such, but I did not.
[I don't even know a thing about it since local TV news is generally not my cup of tea.]
If you need further hints, I'll be more than happy to continue.