Originally Posted by knotyeagle
Good to hear that you testified at a DMV hearing for revocation of someone's commercial drivers license. Did you answer the questions of the hearing officer or did you say "for reasons of national security I cannot divulge the answer"? When asked to present documentation of your arrest of the individual did you withhold such documentation "for reasons of national security". In fact when the DMV hearing officer asked you for your name did you decline "for reasons of national security".
Obviously, no.
Originally Posted by knotyeagle
Is this the "appeals due process" you were thinking of? I'll have a lot more respect for the TSA when they stop coming up with rules (bypassing laws of Congress) that everyone in all industries cannot make sense of.
I was unawareof TSA's influence on private pilots' licenses and hazmat certificates until you brought it up. I agree that this seems to violate due process standards. However, as I am similarly unprepared to discuss national security issues that I don't know much about, I can't suggest a ready solution. I'm also not real sure what this has to do with a FAM getting an FC seat.
Originally Posted by knotyeagle
And to close out your quotation on number of law enforcement agencies (18,000) is very close to number that I learned when I was at Texas Southmost College (AAS Law Enforcement Technology, Decemeber 1976) and Corpus Christi State University (BS Criminal Justice, May 1979). We might have even read the same books.
Been there and done that.
BA Biology, San Jose State University, 1976; MS Criminal Justice, The University of Alabama, 1986. Roll Tide.