Jon, I have a serious question. Where do we draw the line. If you are suggesting we don't respond when Doc drags up an old thread, for no useful purpose. Why should we ignore only his? What if 10 people a day begin doing it. Like the other person did today. Or 20, or 30? Where is the line drawn. If this occurred we would never get any new info. Doc has been repeatedly asked not to do it. Should peer pressure not be employed to discourage him? If your response is to "just ignore him". I wonder does that not create an Animal Farm situation. "ALL ANIMALS ARE EQUAL SOME ARE JUST MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS". Therefore if you have more than 3000 posts you are free to post in EVERY forum with drivel? I tend to think of it as a Neville Chamberline apeasement issue. If you give away one country, then the axis wanted another,and another. It never ended.
Now I will concede, there is a good chance my thoughts are wrong. I feel bad about the disruption. I was the first to critize Doc for dragging up the old post. I tried to do it in a polite way. As a matter of fact, I definded Doc in this thread last week. http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/Forum1/HTML/003707.html
I wish the other major poster on the boards would stay out of defending Doc. As I said, the most prolific poster on the board, does not need your help to respond.
Having said that, Jon what is your thoughts. Where does one draw the line?