FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - EMB170 beats 737 & M80 post-LRTC implementation?
Old Mar 21, 2005 | 2:03 pm
  #2  
formeraa
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: HH Gold, AA Gold
Posts: 10,613
Originally Posted by HKG_Flyer1
Flying from DFW-DCA in a couple of months (rare opportunity for advance purchase), I instinctively started to book AA, rather than US, as US operates a EMB170 on the route.

However, as I thought about my minimal upgrade chances with AA (low fare, PLT), I wondered how the LRTC seat compared with the US Express seat.

Interestingly, the EMB 170 seat appears to be more spacious, with the following dimensions:

Seat width: 18.25" versus AA's 17"
Seat pitch: 32-33" versus AA's 31" - 32"

Am I looking at this right? Following AA's elimination of in-flight service, is there any compelling reason to book AA on this route (as usual out of DFW, AA is significantly more expensive)?

I am PLT with AA and Gold with US, so I get bonus miles with both carriers.
An EMB 170 is NOT a regional jet. It is a full size jet (albeit shorter and narrower) with full size seats with extra width and pitch. The only advantage that I can see is that AA might have better back-up flights (if the original one is delayed or cancelled) and AA is doing marginally better from the financial perspective.
formeraa is offline