Originally Posted by
Lefly
I don't care how someone reaches status, I was just saying that if the new status holders spend the same as previous years and at the same time ex status holders don't spend anymore with BA, the fact that the number of status customer stays the same is not equal to financial improvement or success...
I agree with you here, but in order to gauge improvement or success we need to know whether ex-status holders were replaced by other passengers, which we don't. My first inclination is that BA would not find it difficult to sell "cheap" business class tickets to premium leisure travellers who are not interested in status. AA is probably happy that
I class on Transcons is no longer being used by BAEC TP runners as an additional sector on the ticket with no additional revenue for Joint Business. There are many unknowns, but if we assume that ex-status holders were predominantly flying on "cheap" fares because TPs were awarded based on the cabin, there is no reason to think that those seats won't sell themselves based on price. Just like any other airline attracts unaffiliated passengers for its cheapest tickets. So, if (and that's an if) the number of passengers and the mix of fares are the same, all it means that those on higher fares are getting status and those on the lower fares no longer do. I'd call it a wash rather than improvement or success.