FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - The SQ First Anomaly - will it be fixed?
View Single Post
Old Sep 24, 2003 | 11:33 pm
  #2  
KenF
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Wirral, UK
Programs: BA-Gld, BD Lifetime Gld, LH Pleb, *Wd GPG, HH-Dmd, Amex: can take their Cent card and <CENSORED>
Posts: 756
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by alexwuk:
Does anyone know why BD offer 300% of flown miles in First Class for all Star Carriers except SQ, where only 200% is offered? Will this change? Is there anyone at DC I can speak to about it?

I'm considering using BD as a second program to get *G; but I'll be doing about 21000 miles in SQ F, and I won't use BD if I only get twice the flown mileage (versus 3.75x on LH M&M).

Regards,
Alex
</font>
Sadly, it's not an anomaly, it's intentional.

I queried it when the new programme came in, as I had a very long SQ-F flight coming up, and was told by bmi that it had been a specific requirement of SQ (seemingly each *A carrier has to ratify the earn/redeem profile of the other carriers FF programme). A long chat with SQs marketing department confirmed this. SQ have vetoed the 1x/2x/3x redemption in DC as they feel it is more generous than KrisFlyer and thus a competetive threat. I'm not quite sure why LH doesn't pose the same threat, though I have a sneaking suspicion that the SQ/LH codeshares have something to do with it

Of course, if, as it seems, it is actually generating a dis-incentive for bmi flyers to book on SQ, then it seems to have backfired somewhat. After all, you can fly in F cheaper on OZ and TG and get 3x miles to boot.

However until SQ actually release award seats to bmi the earn/burn ratios are moot, since we aren't going to see a seat on SQ anyway!

Ken

"Understanding is a three-endged sword, there is your side, their side, and the Truth." - Ambassador Kosh, B5
KenF is offline