Originally Posted by
kangarooflyer88
It's unclear what the cause of the delay is. Maybe it is unscheduled maintenance but I'd push Air Canada further to get specifics. Certainly under the APPR they must provide compensation for scheduled maintenance and unscheduled maintenance that was caused due to negligence (i.e. forgetting to leave the heating on in an aircraft overnight causing pipes to burst). At the same time, you cannot simply look at the root cause and stop your analysis there. You have to look at all causes of the disruptions and determine the role they play on the disruption. For instance, if Air Canada did not rebook you on one of their flights departing within 9 hours of the originally scheduled departure time and did not rebook you on the next available flight of any airline (including competitors) an argument could be made that the cause of much of the disruption was a commercial decision made by the airline to reduce the out of pocket costs associated with having to rebook you on a competitor airline which would be eligible for compensation.
-RooFlyer88
The bolded sentence has zero legal merit. Under APPR ss. 10 to 12 and 19, compensation eligibility hinges solely on the originating cause of the disruption, not subsequent rebooking decisions, even if delayed beyond 9 hours or competitors. Rebooking under s.17 is a distinct mitigation obligation. Non-compliance may trigger standards enforcement but cannot re-categorize or "cause" the disruption for compensation purposes. No legal precedent supports this argument whatsoever.
Stop spreading misinformation. It's honestly pathetic.