Originally Posted by
Gables Travelor
I signed up for EF and am disappointed. It constantly shows C inventory on certain transatlantic legs, but when trying to book directly with the CK desk using a SWU, the agent says there are no seats available. The first couple of times I assumed there was a slim margin of error between what EF shows and what the AA agent reads on the screen. However, recently EF showed C7 on a flight from MIA to LHR but the CK agent said that while there are plenty of seats available for purchase in business class, there are 0 seats available for a SWU. My only choice was to waitlist.
I was so frustrated with EF and AA that I created a prompt on ChatGPT explaining my frustration. This was the response:
“On American,
C ≠ usable SWU inventory 100% of the time anymore.
What ExpertFlyer is reading:
- Raw fare bucket availability published in the GDS (C7)
What AA.com is enforcing:
- Upgrade-eligible C inventory, which is now a subset of that bucket
In plain English: AA can publish C seats for
pricing, fare construction, or revenue flexibility while simultaneously
blocking those same seats from SWUs. This is especially common on:
- Transatlantic flights
- High-premium leisure routes
- Flights with strong PE → Biz upsell demand
ExpertFlyer sees what
could be sold. AA.com enforces what
can be upgraded.”
If ChatGPT is correct, then what good is my annual subscription to EF?
Thoughts?
Are you using the EF award availability search function and searching point to point? If you’re using the general availability function or not just searching one leg at a time in the award function, what you are describing will happen.
What GPT described is accurate.