Originally Posted by
JJeffrey
The pax to lav ratios may be similar on paper but I think the real world use cases of the XLR are different (especially for J). I'm sure that's all the AA execs looked at when giving the "ok" to this layout.
- Realistically with the only other lavs in the rear you'll have at least 12 more PE pax using the front J lav as well, so the ratio is more like 32:1
- On the longer XLR flights you'll have some folks brushing their teeth, doing makeup, maybe changing into PJ's, etc., stuff that takes longer
- On a lot of XLR flights you have bathroom rush hours (after meal service, before landing) and only 1 lav in the front to handle all of J and PE
- The ratio is similar but on a widebody you have 3+ lav options; If one gets backed up it's easy to pop over to another, no such option on the XLR
And in general the common/public space on XLR (or narrowbody in general) is going to be more limited than a widebody. And the more people queue up the more congested it will be.