I totally understand linking the two meals, since it is perhaps likely that one would like all one’s food in the same style. However, whereas there are many cuisines where I delight in having their dinners, for several, I don’t really like their breakfast. Most FAs seem happy to help out if they have others on hand. It5 remains to be seen how this works under the new preorder-only regime starting in March.
Originally Posted by
laspvg
Just want to follow up. The Hindu non-vegetarian meal I got was Chicken Tikka Marsala. Not enough meat but the flavor was good. I will take it over Short ribs anytime.
Agree that flavor was real good! And if I may, US portion sizing is so out of whack with the rest of the world, that to me the portion was Goldilocks’ «just right.»
Another funny thing is that UA is calling it a «non-veg» meal. That means there is meat in it, as so many Hindu meals do not, and now diners are being warned about the presence of meat. Note that in the US (and most of the western world), we warn people if there is not meat/fish in the meal, by calling it “vegetarian.» Nothing wrong with either, but my FAs were confused and kept referring to it as my vegetarian meal. I didn’t correct them, but it go me confused every time, and had me checking once more as to what I was actually eating. 😁