Are you saying if I hadn't chased any status in 2024, I wouldn’t have enjoyed the FTL earned in 2023 for 2 years 2025 & 2026 ? This is what I meant when I responded I would have preferred not to make the spend in 2024 to go up to SEN. And that M&M agent clearly confirmed in early 2024 when I had not yet flown much that year that I’d have FTL until early 2027.

“Dead year” ! Sounds dreadful. Sadly, I learnt this term very late, here in this forum. If this had been an M&M formal concept they could have reminded travellers of its impact during transition period.
Are you not making a contradiction here though ? On one hand dead year was eliminated in the new system, but on the other hand it disadvantaged two types of travellers causing them not to get any recognition for a qualification year in the ...same new system.
In any case, the point I made about traveller FS was being worse off compared to S for an old programme qualification year not in the new one. For a qualification year in the new system, they all get equal treatment relative to their spend.

I agree and reflect this with the FS example. But the lack of recognition compared to S which I was alleging referred to a qualification year under the old system.

If anyone tells me the official communication channels should have made it clear what the status roll-over rules were during transition when their own staff wasn’t able to convey simple provisions about the eVouchers benefit, then I have the right to call M&M and their “official channels” a big scam.

I expect you answer not using a less polite tone than I used when replying to you. I “bothered” to read their communications but there was nothing tackling cases like mine hence the reason I contacted them. I reckon it would have been more clear had I been a member of this forum and actively asked questions well before the transition. If you mean this forum is one of their official channels, then I must admit my mistake of staying well misinformed relying on their newsletters or support desk. Otherwise, do not make a biased statement that everything was clear and on top of it spit an offense to a fellow member of the forum. Bring a proof in the form of a communication you saved from M&M where they were sending out those “well understood rules”.