Originally Posted by
GundamWing01
nice work. but the main issue here is the 100 years war between us and amex. both parties have been in the game for a long time.
we game. amex responded w/ RAT. they do clawbacks. YMMV w/ saks credit. altho inconsistent.
example old DP:
http://www.reddit.com/r/amex/comment...edit_claw_back
LLL credit is same thing. we gaming now. i wanna see wat RAT does. they fully know. we just need to see wat is enforced.
Physical gcs at Saks have worked for years with clawback reports few and far between. Same for UA TB wiring for the airline fee credit (never saw any clawback for that although there is the rare report of the it not triggering the credit).
RAT is not all of a sudden going to step in here for the Lululemon credit. Worst case they somehow stop physical gcs from getting the credit like they did with the Hilton gcs for the Biz Plat.