FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - MNL to KUL - AirAsia v Philippine Airlines v Malaysian
Old Jun 29, 2025 | 12:08 pm
  #5  
Saint4805
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: United Kingdom
Programs: Bonvoy LTTitanium, BAEC Silver
Posts: 718
Originally Posted by IAN-UK
It must be irritating when respondents ignore the central tenets of your enquiry, but safety is a difficult, frustrating area to address and all three carriers can have their bad days in terms of reliability.

If you have a soft spot for Air Asia it sounds like a good choice: low fares with the ability to buy yourself into comfort at very little extra cost, plus it flies out of T3. Though good luck in finding a lounge

My choice is distorted by Oneworld membership. If the price is right I'll take MH, swallow the T1 penalty and enjoy lounge, seat selection and in-flight catering with maybe a handful of avios dropping into my account; though as often as not it's Air Asiia.
Originally Posted by dvs7310
In my opinion all are equally safe for the most part. And all have their typical delays on a daily basis.

I thought 5J also flew this route (Cebu Pacific), I thought in early 2024 when my friend from Manila met me in KL they flew 5J both ways. Depending on which iteration of Air Asia you're dealing with, I prefer 5J over Philippines Air Asia (Z2).

On cheaper fares most MH economy fares earn nothing on oneworld partners so that probably wouldn't influence me much unless you have status and can get some benefits otherwise. However they so sell business class upgrades very cheaply intra-Asia if space is available.

I wouldn't choose PR over Z2 or 5J, no useful mileage earning for the premium.



T3 International has PP lounges, and even last time I was there (about 1 year ago) the domestic lounge was open to PP as well, though I don't see it on the PP app now. Personally I'd take MH as well just for OW benefits, but very unlikely to have any mileage earning outside of MH's own program. But if the OP has no status that won't help them.

Typically as well, Air Asia has really crappy seat pitch in normal seats but their upcharge for exit rows isn't punitive. I've done that a few times.



Exit rows are usually a pretty cheap upcharge. But yeah, very punitive for changes, even on what they call 'full flex'. I nearly got caught out by that once at DMK, but thankfully I was able to get there a lot earlier than I expected. I didn't check the terms very closely when I bought it and knew it was going to be tight, but didn't realize they require changes on 'full flex' tickets to still be 48 hours in advance. Kind of defeats the purpose of 'full flex'.
Thanks both.

I am a bit more safety conscious than most as I missed AF447 by three days back in 2009 and the recent Air India accident is still fresh in my mind. Appreciate that some may find it a bit irrational and that all are safe options but I prefer to prioritise safety especially outside of Europe and N America.

I hadn't considered Cebu but will look into them a bit further. It looks like they also operate an A321neo which is a plus. Unlike MH and Air Asia, PR have no history of accidents in recent years but will have operated considerably less flights than Air Asia and MH. I flew MH many years ago and was very satisfied with the product but am aware they have had problems since then.

I'll check out some travel vlogs covering the options.
Saint4805 is offline