Originally Posted by
KARFA
setting aside some of the issues around special assistance etc in this case which may mean it is out of scope anyway regardless of airlines (we don't yet know the exact details), i would say this misrepresents the current case law as set out in the czech airlines case amongst others. it is entirely relevant the QF flight was on a BA codeshare, and that it incurred a delay.
https://curia.europa.eu/juris/docume...=1&cid=7738836
I don't see that the referenced case is relevant - In the referenced case, the initial flight was under the scope of EC261 and then connected onwards on a delayed flight . If that was the situation here, I would have agreed that the OP was entitled to compensation based on past cases , regardless of whether it was a codeshare flight ot not ( as per 2013 case of Folkerts vs AF )
In this case, the impacted flight is outside the scope of EC261