Would you like to indicate the points in the posts from which you made that inference? It seems to reveal more about your mindset than others’ possibly.

I suppose an alternative reading would be that BA IT screwed up once again, and that they are still screwing up by removing validity of partner cards issued very recently.

It’s not really surprising that the screwup happened since the rules around partner cards are very unclear. In the past, a nomination during a TP collection year would give status for the remainder of the year and the next. The rule now seems to be if a recipient has lower status than the card the former rules apply, where if they don’t it lasts for the remainder of this year only.

Which means no GGL can extend their partner’s allocations using this year’s partner cards, because they already have that status. And we can’t add nominees to the list because the effing IT is broken.

All of this seems to give ample cause to “insult” (or mock, or complain about) BA? What do you think?