Originally Posted by
orbitmic
To put it simply, I don’t think either Mr Doyle’s or Mr Daniel’s comments above have any credibility or trustworthiness and I would not believe either of them on the basis of such purposefully vague statements that cannot be held against them if they are lying.
If they were confident in what they were saying, they would provide figures which would be incredibly easy to do.
If it ends up being the case in due time, very happy for them, but I’ll personally just wait for such figures to come.
I think Sean Doyle’s comments are clear enough - even without precise numbers - the stakes are too high and it would be career ending to engage in market manipulation with criminal, regulatory and civil implications.