Originally Posted by
nacho
ANA should put a flight to CPH. UA too - I'm really fed up with having to use LHG as the feeder flights - now it's even worse that there is no lounge access at CPH unless you are SEN with LH.
Is there really enough business to justify flights from both ARN and CPH? I would imagine that ANA selected ARN in part to entice Swedes to save an extra step to go to CPH. I can't imagine they did it for tax/fee savings.
Even if I got the Scandinavian airport wrong, I don't think that changes my key assumption that code-sharing isn't likely. Especially as most Scandinavians see the SK Nordic routes as basically bus routes and wouldn't mind giving up a couple to hours to connect to a SAS flight if they are in it for the points and not the soft product.