You are correct, mea culpa. In my humble opinion it’s commonly understood but certainly I only know what a very small number of people understand. And having heard it twice, several months apart, and not seeing any contradictory datapoints since, I presumed common understanding.

(And you know what happens when you presume … oh, never mind 😉.)

Would the following be more satisfactory to you? “… relatively newly stated, in April 2024 and again in June 2024, restriction …”