Originally Posted by
mfirst
Towards the end of 2024 (as some of you know from my previous posts), it was clear that I was going to miss 1K by a few segments and/or a few thousand dollars - so, since there was not a reasonable option for an addition $4k in spend in December, I started changing my flights from 2 PQF trips (each way) to 3 PQF....instead of CLE-DEN-OGG, I changed to CLE-IAD-SFO-OGG (surprisingly, got a bunch of CPU's on that!).... and now, I am adding extra segments if I am not in a real rush to get somewhere and I can rationalize in my own mind that it is giving me more options as I fight to status again,.....is this really what we (and UA) have in mind for their program?
Originally Posted by
kirkwoodj
Just for FTers!!!

Originally Posted by
jsloan
No, of course it isn’t. Ant outside of FlyerTalk, I suspect the number of people intentionally adding segments to achieve status is quite small — a rounding error on their overall flyer population.
I think UA is very okay with this as when I look at mileage tickets it is usually less miles if there are more connections. I agree PQF criteria is for those of us in non-hub locations. But multi segments on mileage tickets has been the norm for so many years.