LHR to YYZ on Jan 1. Also the menu for 49, 67, 85,95,99,113,115,121,155,159,171,177,179,183,189,1 91,197,203,209,217,219,223,225,227,229,239,267,293 and 297.

Some observations - why is it necessary the have a choice of a cheese sandwich or a cheese sandwich for the second meal on these menus? Could they not have come up with with a choice that didn't involve cheese? I have nothing against cheese but I know a few people who aren't all that keen...or perhaps it was mandated that the second meal shall be a cheese sandwich, whether vegetarian or not.

If you fly BA 16 from SYD through to LHR you will be pleased (if you are a lover of overcooked beef) to have steak for both of the principal mains on each of the two sectors. Could they not have rung the changes a bit and maybe served lamb or pork on one of the sectors? Noted that the poster was perfectly happy with the meals which is good to hear, but I do wonder sometimes how much thought goes into putting some of these menus together.