FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - "Hopscotch approach" - study on most efficient way to board a plane
Old Dec 5, 2024 | 2:57 pm
  #13  
moondog
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Community Builder
Community Influencer
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 46,217
Originally Posted by AllanJ
Boarding from back to front reduces passengers crossing paths to get to their seats, But it also creates a zone of concentrated stowing that progresses forward faster than the zone of concentrated seating and also impedes aisle movement. .
I can than think of two ways (one which you mentioned) to checkmate the concentrated stowing zone: 1. charge money for cabin baggage; 2. size/weight limits.

I flew Avelo twice this past summer and those guys are few crazy...very effecient boarding/deplaning on both flights.

The second approach is common in Europe/Asia and seems to be fairly effective when enforced.

A tangentially relevant issue is the reliability of checked baggage. Even though I almost always entrust my luggage to airlines, I've learned that this is a bit of risk when tight connections are involved. Furthermore, some airlines/airports are hopelessly slow on the delivery part of the equation...a decent way to earn some extra Delta miles, I suppose.
moondog is offline