Originally Posted by
jsloan
Oh, I don't disagree -- I don't have the charts at my disposal, nor do I know the real-world performance of the E175 vs. the published maxima. My point was merely that the plane nominally has a 30% range buffer compared to the distance, which makes me think it's worth somebody's time at UA to do the calculations and model it out.
I am certain that's happened, and equally certain it was ruled out just as quickly
