Originally Posted by
IAN-UK
It's probably less a million mile seduction, more the AvGeek joy of a challenge satisfied by a some intense hours on the internet. I'm guessing vanishingly few of the planned itineraries will get ticketed and flown. Infinitely more armchair/desk trips will be planned than travelled. And, after all, the glittering prize isn't a million dollars, but miles in what is, for most of us, the most awkward of alliances.
$3,000 seems to be the magic number, but i see little attempt to account for either non-ticketing costs (positioning, hotels, visas, time), or the very high risk of failure en route unless time and hotel costs are increased significantly.
As you suggest, a successful itinerary would really need to mitigate risk: one disconnect, even on a single (protected) ticket, could send failure rippling through a tightly scheduled trip. One way to reduce risk is to introduce comfortable time buffers between flight - which boosts costs (hotels) or discomfort (sleeping at airports).
So it boils down to a fun exercise in scheduling, but a hopelessly unattractive risk-reward undertaking if carried beyond the planning stage. But clearly a smart move by SAS in generating some marketing noise.
That exactly, when I saw this challenge, I found it fun and if manageable under CHF 3500, I was going for it. But then when adding some buffer days (hotel costs) and the fact that I only have 10 days off to spare until year end, I decided to not go ahead.
But that challenge of constructing a workable itinerary was fun to do and I was looking forward to enjoying a few days in LA, Bangkok, Taipei, Mexico, London or Budapest to only name a few.
Most members here are AVGeeks, ready to pay more just to fly specific airlines or airplanes or going through specific airports (I know I do).

I'm now just waiting to see and read the first feedback about a successful challenge, so I can be quietly jealous of him/her.