Originally Posted by
Carlusa
I think they just need to better define ‘extraordinary’ because to me a rainy day in London is ordinary, but heatwave, snow or storm would be extraordinary. Basically I think anything where there’s a yellow or red warning from the local weather authority should come under extraordinary. But whatever they go with it needs to be simple and easy to understand to stop all the wasted time and money arguing back and forth and forcing people to take claims to court.
I would agree that would have been nice to have more clarity throughout the Regulation, but the EC doesn't believe in writing clear regulations and likes to leave things nice and vague.
I wonder whether it was deliberately done like that in order to provide plenty of work for lawyers? Maybe it is a job creation scheme in disguise