Originally Posted by
ChurnieEls
I mean if IAG/EI hadn't lowballed them & refused to negotiate from the jump it wouldn't have happened.
They asked for 24%, management wouldn't budge from 12% and low and behold the answer is split the difference.
Whatever EI management might have 'saved' by not blinking initially is gone up in flames from all the EC-261 & hire ins.
I'd be surprised that that matters too much to IAG. Its just a blip in the balance sheet. The impact on future profitability is likely all IAG leadership are interested in as it determines market valuation of their stake in EI.