Originally Posted by
diesteldorf
Advise Needed:
Booked a one night stay at WA Las Vegas for $340.00 nightly rate ($436.02 AFTER RESORT FEE AND TAXES)
The Crockfords is now $281.00 per night ($318.84 AFTER TAXES AND NO RESORT FEE APPARENTLY)
I'm not planning to gamble and am just looking for a decent place to eat, relax, and use the FHR Plat credit.
I know WA location is nearer to the strip and I think they offer Hilton Diamond benefits of $25 or $50 in addition to the $100 FHR credit, where Crockfords does not.
Money isn't a huge issue, but would anyone give me there opinion on what to do?
Would you stay at WA or cancel and go to Crockfords?
EDIT: Even though FHR says there is $0.00 due at the hotel, GOOGLE is telling me that Crockfords does indeed have a RESORT FEE of $51.02....potentially increasing the nightly rate to $369.86
If you're comparing Crockfords to WA, I'd do Crockfords. Yes there's a resort fee, but the amenities are better. The room has more space and it's a better stay. WA is strip, Crockford isn't close to many things. My last few visits have been to Resorts World and Bellagio. I would still choose Resorts World.