Originally Posted by
hhdl
That would seem to indicate that Mr. Darr, Esq., after you presumably shared more than you have here (for understandable privacy reasons) and his consulting of relevant statutes and rulings (or at least the Cliffs notes thereof) led to the conclusion that the chance of prevailing and recovering costs was not favorable.
If your presumption is correct, he didn't share anything of the sort with me, just stopped responding. Would have been nice if he said that to me, as I would have understood and not delayed and emailed him every two months asking if he was still interested. I'm not sure what else I shared with him that's more than here besides exact numbers and specifics.
Originally Posted by
hhdl
How interested is your AU in pursuing this, since it's likely their dealings that are the trigger?
Like I did for the card, they'd prefer for me to do the work.