Originally Posted by
badAmex
He went dark. He was going to take it on contingency. I don't really want to pour more money into going after Goliath. However, arbitration seems like a potential route.
That would seem to indicate that Mr. Darr, Esq., after you presumably shared more than you have here (for understandable privacy reasons) and his consulting of relevant statutes and rulings (or at least the Cliffs notes thereof) led to the conclusion that the chance of prevailing and recovering costs was not favorable.
How interested is your AU in pursuing this, since it's likely their dealings that are the trigger?