Originally Posted by
LovePrunes
Yeah, I'm skeptical too, like you seem to be. If there was evidence that AA lost, the George Costanza side would certainly want that known far and wide. I'm of the opinion it's an urban myth by people who really REALLY want it to be true. What's the expression the kids use? "My truth!"
🙄🤣
When this was discussed a few days ago, the claim was that those who won couldn’t talk about it because of NDAs. I said then, and repeat now (since I am too lazy to look for my earlier post) that it seems weird that a judgement by a SCC judge would be protected by an NDA. A settlement before a judge decided the case certainly could be protected by NDA, but the it’s a settlement, not an outright win in small claims court.